Comments on: Comical Misandry and the Involved Father; How Not to Screw up the Conversation About the Modern Dad https://citydadsgroup.com/comical-misandry-and-the-involved-father-how-not-to-screw-up-the-conversation-about-the-modern-dad/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=comical-misandry-and-the-involved-father-how-not-to-screw-up-the-conversation-about-the-modern-dad Navigating Fatherhood Together Sat, 10 Dec 2022 19:08:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: daddy in a strange land https://citydadsgroup.com/comical-misandry-and-the-involved-father-how-not-to-screw-up-the-conversation-about-the-modern-dad/#comment-4216 Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:55:07 +0000 http://citydadsgroup.com/nyc/2011/08/05/comical-misandry-and-the-involved-father-how-not-to-screw-up-the-conversation-about-the-modern-dad/#comment-4216 FYI, this post inspired my own: http://daddyinastrangeland.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/trophy-husband-one-year-later/

]]>
By: daddy in a strange land https://citydadsgroup.com/comical-misandry-and-the-involved-father-how-not-to-screw-up-the-conversation-about-the-modern-dad/#comment-4215 Fri, 05 Aug 2011 20:00:12 +0000 http://citydadsgroup.com/nyc/2011/08/05/comical-misandry-and-the-involved-father-how-not-to-screw-up-the-conversation-about-the-modern-dad/#comment-4215 A year ago next week, my family was featured on the Today Show for a segment about SAHDs pegged to Marie Claire’s unfortunately framed story about SAHDS being the new “trophy husband” status symbols for alpha moms. Of the guys interviewed for the piece, the ultimate editorial framing of which was not what we’d expected, I volunteered for the video segment. I thought that the videographer, who hadn’t read the piece, did a great job, and that Matt Lauer, in his cross-examining of the magazine editor and “expert witness” psychologist after the video segment, did a great job exploding the editor’s framing (and referring back to me in the video in the process). So really, in terms of how not to screw up the public conversation, a lot depends on the luck of having sympathetic allies involved in the set-up and presentation of the discussion. We can’t assume folks’ll have our back or be on the same page, and if they aren’t and we’re all by ourselves, especially if we’re on their media turf, it’s very easy to get steamrolled no matter our intentions. Anyway, here’s that piece (scroll to the bottom for the video): http://today.msnbc.msn.com​/id/38628278/ns/today-pare​nting/#.TjxIGs1qyhc

]]>